Georg Eckmayr
OVERVIEW ︎︎︎
ARTWORK ++
Catalog of works ︎︎︎
Tangible Data ︎︎︎
Networked Sculptures
Machine Languages︎︎︎
Digital Experimental
- latent_me
- interframe allegations
- Is it Me or a
Misunderstanding? - UNTITLED ME
- a generic landscape
- HOMEOSTASIS
- they are mine!
- THE BUG
- Geometrie der Dauer, timebased bodies
Projects, Installations, Films, Sculpture, …
- THE QUANTS
- Untitled Space
- The Abilitiy to Perceive (No Man’s Land)
- RESCUE
- Maschinenpfade
- Boat Trip without Passengers
- Relics from the Internet
- Estimated net-worth, over
- Human / Material
- #Super User
- Iconic Landscapes
- Impressions
- white cube 3000 watt
- Blacken my digital CV
- Don´t be modest
- Desire Lines
- Hand Job for K.
- SAFE / Incubator
- Landscapes
- surface / intimacy
- Anima Materia / The Suit
- Bleed
THEORY ++
COLLABORATION ++
Info / CV ++
- The Viennese Georg Eckmayr is an artist, researcher and lecturer.
He studied digital art at the class of Peter Weibel under whose supervision he also completed and defended his doctoral thesis on digital images.
- Please contact me via one of these platforms below or the email on the CV page.
Is it ME
or a
Misunderstanding
>> Portrait of me, machine learning algorithms, data sets, ink-jet on Hahnemühle paper / 2022-2025
The interpretation of a self portrait via an algorithm trained on landscapes. Since faces are not part of the training set and the facial structure does not match the patterns of trained landscape images, the algorithm failed creatively
The interpretation of a self portrait via an algorithm trained on landscapes. Since faces are not part of the training set and the facial structure does not match the patterns of trained landscape images, the algorithm failed creatively. In a further attempt of reinterpretation I created iterations embedding the resulting structure of the first process in varying other data sets, from fur based to crystals.
Where are the borders of the system ME within a certain environment? Which is the distinction, that defines the visual ME as a “two-sided form”?
The interpretation of a self portrait via an algorithm trained on landscapes. Since faces are not part of the training set and the facial structure does not match the patterns of trained landscape images, the algorithm failed creatively. In a further attempt of reinterpretation I created iterations embedding the resulting structure of the first process in varying other data sets, from fur based to crystals.
Where are the borders of the system ME within a certain environment? Which is the distinction, that defines the visual ME as a “two-sided form”?
"Is it ME or a misunderstanding?", pigment print, 60x80 cm, portrait & ai landscape algorithm, 2022 
latent ME II (215x120 cm)